|
CALVIN,
JOHN REJECTED TITHING
Institutes
4.20.14, 16 and comments on Rom. 1:21-27 and 2:14-15
***Calvin
argued, "I would have preferred to pass over this matter in utter silence if I were not aware that here many dangerously go
astray. For there are some who deny that a commonwealth is duly framed which neglects the political system of Moses,
and is ruled by the common laws of nations. Let other men consider how perilous and seditious this notion is; it will
be enough for me to have proved it false and foolish . . . It is a fact that the law of God which we call
the moral law is nothing else than a testimony of natural law and of that conscience which God has engraved upon the minds
of men. Consequently, the
entire scheme of this equity of which we are now speaking has been prescribed in it. Hence, this equity alone must be
the goal and rule and limit of all laws. Whatever laws shall be framed to that rule, directed to that goal, bound by
that limit, there is no reason why we should disapprove of them, howsoever they may differ from the Jewish law, or among themselves
. . . For the statement of some, that the law of God given through Moses is dishonored when it is abrogated and new laws preferred
to it, is utterly vain. For others are not preferred to it when they are more approved, not by a simple comparison,
but with regard to the condition of times, place, and nation; or when that law is abrogated which was never enacted for us.
For the Lord through the hand of Moses did not give that law to be proclaimed among all nations and to be in force everywhere;
but when he had taken the Jewish nation into his safekeeping, defense, and protection, he also willed to be a lawgiver especially
to it; and -- as became a wise
lawgiver -- he had special concern for it in making its laws.
|