Should the Church Teach Tithing?
A Theologian’s Conclusions about a Taboo Doctrine
D
MANY ARTICLES: PLEASE SCROLL DOWN
Jews Do Not Teach Tithing
Rabbi Geoffrey Dennis, Congregation Kol Ami, Flower Mound: “The Jewish community isn’t structured around tithing,” he said. The concept originally was tied to agricultural production in Israel, with the tithe a temple tax, he said.
Now, Jewish worshippers make pledges to meet their budget.
CONTEMPORARY JEWISH TITHING AND TITHE CONCEPT
Jewish Tithing:
(1) Melchizedek in Genesis 14 is not referenced.
(2) The tithe goes to charity and not to support the synagogue or rabbi.
(3) It is not on gross income before taxes.
(4) Business expenses and education can be deducted first.
(5) Do not give over 20%. It is not wise.
http://judaism.about.com/library/3_askrabbi_o/bl_simmons_tithe.htm?r=94
ASK RABBI SIMMONS
Question
According to my friend, one should tithe 30% of his/her income. I don’t believe this is correct. What does the Bible say about tithe?
Answer
Back from the time that Abraham welcomed the strangers into his tent (Genesis chapter 18), charity has been a foundation of Jewish life. The Torah commands us to give 10 percent of our earnings to people in need, based on Leviticus 25:35 and Deut. 15:7-8. This is called Ma’aser, literally “one tenth” (hence the English word “tithe”). This is colloquially called tzedakah (charity), which Maimonides lists charity as one of the 613 mitzvahs.
Ten percent of a person’s wages after taxes should be set aside for tzedakah. Business expenses and Jewish education costs may be deducted from the 10 percent. (Some people deduct only two-thirds of a boy’s Torah education cost.)
For those who want to do extra, the Torah allows you to give 20 percent. Above that amount is unrealistic. If you give too much, you’ll come to neglect other aspects of your life.
To learn more, read “Ma’aser Kesafim – Giving a Tenth to Charity” edited by Cyril Domb (Feldheim), and “Permission to Receive,” by Lawrence Kellemen (Targum Press). See also: “Code of Jewish Law” Y.D. 249:2; “Igrot Moshe”(R’ M. Feinstein) Y.D. II, 112; “Orchat Rabeinu (R’ Y. Kanievsky) I, 302.
With blessings from Jerusalem,
Rabbi Shraga Simmons
Aish.com
JEWISH CHARITY
http://www.innerstream.ca/blog
Saturday, February 21, 2009
[He interprets “tithe” in Malachi as “charity.”]
[He teaches that one’s family essentials come first.]
Mishpatim: Charity In A Failing Economy
by Rabbi Lazer on February 21, 2009 10:32PM (EST)
Trimming Excess
For most of us the failing economy has translated only into worry and rhetoric. Though unemployment is up and many homes have been lost most of us still have bread on our tables and Cable TV in our bedrooms. But there one sector that is already feeling the pinch, I speak of charitable institutions.
Ask the treasurer of your local Synagogue or charity and you will have all the evidence you need. Contributions are in the decline while the roster of needs continues to climb. Resources are dwindling, projects are being curtailed and members of staff are being laid off. Those who serve the neediest of society have a desperate need for more resources, yet they feel the crunch ahead of all. This makes sense. When our funds are low we trim excesses. First to go are the charity pledges. Then we downsize vacation budgets. Then luxury items and extracurricular activities.
The problem with this way of thinking is that charity is really not a luxury; it is a necessity – for both the recipient and the donor. The recipient needs the money and the donor needs to give it. If we want to survive this recession we need to survive together – we must provide for the poor.
To understand the real life benefit that charity offers in times of economic downturn let us delve into the spiritual aspect of charity.
Transforming The Daled
The Hebrew letters Gimmel, Daled and Hei tell the tale of charity. The Talmud teaches that Gimmel and Daled represent the words Gemol Dalim, bestow (to the) destitute. The form of the Gimmel is that of a straight vertical line with a foreleg extended forward and downward, in a walking pattern toward the Daled. The extended foreleg indicates a willingness to connect with and invest in the Daled. The form of the Daled is that of a person bent deeply at the waist; the poor man staggering under the weight of his burden. So forlorn is he that he fails even to notice his benefactor’s approach. He is stripped not only of provision, but of hope itself.
Once the Gimmel meets up with and renders assistance to the Daled, the Daled is enriched. It accepts the Gimmel’s extended hand and uses this vertical line to form the letter Hei. The Hei is, in effect, a Daled with an added vertical line on the left. The Hei stands with confidence on two full legs. No longer bent over, no longer burdened. He has found a friend. He has found hope. He is buoyed with confidence.
Turning a Daled into a Hei is to transform the world of the destitute. The recipient does nothing to earn our largess. He is not entitled to our help. But it is precisely because he is not entitled to it, precisely because we don`t owe it to him, that our action is endowed with meaning. (1)
Tzedek and Hei
The Hebrew word for charity is Tzedakah. The Jewish mystics explained that the word Tzedakah is comprised of the word Tzedek, which means justice, plus the letter Hei. Charity and justice are polar opposites: Justice dictates that we are entitled to the money we earn. Charity dictates that we share our hard earned money with the poor and convert the Daled into a Hei. Indeed, in order to give to charity we must put the Heis of this world ahead of our sense of justice, our Tzedek. This is why you get the word Tzedakah when you append a Hei to Tzedek. (2)
A Deeper Perspective
The notion that justice dictates entitlement to the money we earn reflects a secular form of justice. The Torah has an entirely different viewpoint. The Talmudic sages asked, if G-d loves His children, why are they poor? The answer, so the wealthy would receive reward for giving Tzedakah. G-d distributes His resources among humanity unevenly to give us opportunity to reap the rewards that come from providing for the poor. When we find ourselves with extra money we must remember that it is not ours to keep. It was given to us to distribute to the poor. It belongs to them. To donate it is just, to keep it is theft. (3)
The word Tzadakah or Tzedek plus Hei, represents the idea that Tzedek is served only when we fulfill our obligation toward the Hei, not when we consider ourselves entitled to our extra monies. Giving to charity is thus an act of justice whereas withholding it is a perversion of justice.
A Necessity
We can now appreciate why charity, an obligation at all times, becomes a necessity during economic turndowns. This is not only true for the recipient, whose plight is more severe during a recession, but also for the donor, who requires blessing more acutely. As mentioned earlier, charitable contributions are catalysts for powerful reward. Rewards that are not only spiritual in nature, but also monetary.
The Torah instructs us, “Tithe so that you shall prosper.” The prophet Malachi promised that G-d would “open the windows of heaven and shower us with blessing to no end.” Our sages taught that in the merit of charity we are blessed with life, grace and abundance. Indeed, compassion toward others evinces Divine compassion toward us. In times of economic downturn, when we need G-d’s blessing more than ever, charity is not a luxury. It is a necessity. (4)
This is also why the Torah describes the giving of charity as taking. When our ancestors were instructed to contribute toward the building of the tabernacle G-d told them to “take for me a contribution.” Take, rather than give, which reflects the Jewish belief that the donor receives far more than he gives. At times such as these, when we can use all the blessing we can get, charity is surely an option we must take. (5)
Who Is The Hei?
What if our families don’t have enough? Do we not have to look after our own before allocating our hard earned dollars toward strangers? Does charity not begin at home?
When the discussion centers on a single piece of bread and the question is whether to place it on our table or that of the stranger, our own family certainly comes first. Thankfully, we have yet to reach that point. When our families have their basic necessities and we withdraw support from the poor to ensure that our family is afforded luxury, the stranger does indeed come first. (6)
Footnotes